1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Information Studies & Technology (JIS&T)
  4. Volume 2023, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 2023, Issue 2
  • EISSN: 2616-4930

Abstract

إن مشروعات إنشاء المستودعات الرقمية المؤسساتية في العالم العربي عامة، والجزائر خاصة، تخضع في أغلب الأحوال إلى الاجتهادات الشخصية أكثر مما تخضع للرؤى العلمية المبنية على التخطيط المنهجي الذي يوضح المسار الذي يجب أن يلتزم به المشروع في مواصفاته ومراحل تنفيذه ومتطلبات كل مرحلة، فهناك اعتبارات عديدة. مالية، وبشرية، وقانونية، وإدارية، وتقنية- ينبغي أن تؤخذ في الحسبان في أي مشروع يهدف إلى تأسيس مستودع رقمي مؤسساتي. ومع تزايد الاهتمام بالمستودعات الرقمية، عمدت العديد من الدول إلى إعداد ودعم إنشاء مشاريع مستودعات رقمية وطنية. وفي هذه الدراسة تم عمل دراسة تقييمية على 36 مستودعاً تابعاً للجامعات الجزائرية، وتوصلت نتائجها إلى قصور في أداء المستودعات الرقمية المؤسساتية. كما أظهرت الدراسة أن العديد من الجامعات لا تملك الخبرة والإمكانيات لبناء مستودعات معيارية لتنظيم وإتاحة وحفظ مخرجات باحثيها. من هذا المنطلق تقدم هذه الدراسة رؤيةً لمشروع وطني يكون تحت وصاية وزارة التعليم العالي والبحث العلمي، هدفه دعم إنشاء ومتابعة مشاريع المستودعات الرقمية في المؤسسات الأكاديمية الجزائرية وفق أفضل المعايير والممارسات، وقد اصطلح الباحث على تسمية المشروع ب”اتحاد .“DZCOAR” Algerian Confederation of Open Access Repositories ” مستودعات الوصول الحر في الجزائر ويهدف هذا المشروع إلى تأسيس بنية تحتية وطنية لدعم إنشاء ومتابعة مشاريع المستودعات الرقمية، ويشمل ذلك الدعم المادي، والفني، والتقني، والتشريعي، والإداري.

The projects of implementing institutional digital repositories, in the Arab world in general and in Algeria in particular, are in most cases based on personal efforts rather than adopting vision and systematic planning which would guide such projects to complete successfully by providing all the required aspects, stages, requirements, implementation, timeline and costs. There are many financial, human, legal, administrative and technical considerations to be taken into account when starting an institutional digital repository project. With the increasing interest in digital repositories, many countries have initiated the setting up of such projects and have provided support on national levels.

This study conducted an evaluation of 36 repositories belonging to Algerian universities and found out a deficiency in the performance of these repositories. The study revealed that such universities do not have the experience or the capabilities to enable them to build standard repositories to organize, provide and preserve their researchers’ outputs. Hence, this study presents a suggested vision for a national project to be under the tutelage of the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research. This suggested vision aims to support setting up and managing digital repositories in Algerian universities in accordance with the best standards and practices. The researcher named the project as . This project aims to establish a national infrastructure to support the building and the following-up of digital repositories projects, including financial, technical, legislative and administrative support.

© 2023 [Author(s)], licensee HBKU Press.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/jist.2023.10
2023-09-30
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jist/2023/2/JIST.2023.issue2.10.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/jist.2023.10&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. سوان، ألما والشهري، سليمان بن سالم وفراج، عبد الرحمن أحمد. (2017). الوصول الحر: مبادئ توجيهية للسياسات. الرياض، المملكة العربية السعودية: مدينة الملك عبد العزيز للعلوم والتقنية.
  2. القحطاني، جوزاء بنت محمد. (2015). المستودعات الرقمية المؤسسية.. نشأتها تطورها: تصور مقترح لمشروع المستودع الرقمي المؤسسي لجامعة الأميرة نورة بنت عبدالرحمن. المجلة العربية للدراسات المعلوماتية (5)، 107-143. تم الاسترجاع من https://search.mandumah.com/Record/633492
  3. شواو، عبد الباسط. (2016). تحديات الحفظ الرقمي: رؤية تحليلية واقتراح لحلول معيارية. المجلة الأردنية للمكتبات والمعلومات، 51 (2)، 155-187. تم الاسترجاع من http://dspace.univ-constantine2.dz/handle/123456789/49
  4. الضويحي، فهد. (2014). المستودعات الرقمية المؤسسية في الجامعات السعودية: نحو رؤية لمشروع وطني لدعم مبادرات إنشائها وإدارتها. أطروحة دكتوراه. جامعة الملك عبد العزيز. السعودية. تم الاستجاع من https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.249666
  5. Adachi, J. (2015). Increasing Japanese Open Access Using JAIRO Cloud. Retrieved November 19, 2022, from https://www.nii.ac.jp/irp/archive/brochures/pdf/SPIRL_en.pdf">https://www.nii.ac.jp/irp/archive/brochures/pdf/SPIRL_en.pdf">https://www.nii.ac.jp/irp/archive/brochures/pdf/SPIRL_en.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Australian Partnership for Sustainable Repositories (APSR). (n.d.). Retrieved November 20, 2022, from https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/6614
  7. Awre, C., & Green, R. (2020). Open Source Discovery using Blacklight at the University of Hull. In Resource Discovery for the Twenty-First Century Library (pp. 129-146). Facet. doi: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783301409.010
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Babori, A., & Aknouche, N. (2020). Increasing the Visibility of Grey Literature in Algerian institutional repositories. The Grey Journal, 16(Special Winter), 43-52. doi: https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-z2a-mb5e
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Becker, P.-N., Mennielli, M., & Trachte., K. (2020). Stewarding National User Groups to Strengthen Open Source Software Communities. Publications, 8:(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8020031
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, J. (2009). Comparing consortial repositories: a model-driven analysis. London: UCL (University College London). Retrieved December 14, 2022, from https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/18977/
     [Google Scholar]
  11. CARL. (2020). Terms of Reference for ORWG Task Groups. CARL. Retrieved November 19, 2022, from https://www.carl-abrc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ORWG-task-group-ToR-2020-20201_EN.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Celjak, D., Bekić, Z., Cundeković, M., Jertec, L., Milinović, M., &Zubić, A. (2017). DABAR - the national infrastructure for digital repositories. EUNIS 23rd Annual Congress : Shaping the Digital Future of Universities (pp. 16-24). European University Information Systems Organization. doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-048
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Digital Repository of Ireland. (2015). Building the Digital Repository of Ireland Infrastructure : Report. Digital Repository of Ireland. Retrieved from https://repository.dri.ie/catalog/qr474f68n
     [Google Scholar]
  14. DigitalPreservationEurope. (2008). DPE Repository Planning Checklist and Guidance DPED3.2. HATII at the University of Glasgow. Retrieved 01 01, 2023, from https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc799759/m2/1/high_res_d/platter.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Directorate General for European Programmes, Coordination and Development. (2016). National Policy of the Republic of Cyprus for Open Access to Scientific Information. Retrieved 1 1, 2023, from https://opensciencecy.ucy.ac.cy/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/FINAL-EN-National-Policy-for-Open-Access-to-Scientific-Information.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dobratz, S., & Scholze, F. (2006). DINI institutional repository certification and beyond. Library Hi Tech, 24: (4), 583-594. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830610715446
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hachani, S. (2017, September 29). The state of Open in Algeria: an in-depth view with Samir Hachani. (J. Tennant, Interviewer) ScienceOpen. Retrieved from https://blog.scienceopen.com/2016/10/the-state-of-open-in-algeria-an-in-depth-view-with-samir-hachani/
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hunter, J. (2006, July). The Shifting Landscape of Digital Libraries Research and Development in Australia. ERCIM News, 66:, pp. 20-21. Retrieved Novembre 11, 2022, from https://www.ercim.eu/publication/Ercim_News/enw66/hunter.html
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Joki, S. M. (2007). PEPIA: a Norwegian collaborative effort for institutional repositories. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 23: (2), 204-209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/10650750710748504
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Karacsony, G. (2013). HUNOR: The Collaboration of Hungarian Open Access Repositories. The 2nd International Conference on Integrated Information. 73:, pp. 57-61. Debrecen: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.019
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Karacsony, G. (2013). HUNOR: The Collaboration of Hungarian Open Access Repositories. The 2nd International Conference on Integrated Information. 73:, pp. 57-61. Debrecen: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.019
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Ku, A. (2017). Repository Network in China. COAR 2017 Annual Meeting. Venice. doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.579923
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, L., Liu, X., & Xiaolin, Z. (2009). Open Access Practice in National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Science. World Library and Information Congress. Milan: IFLA. Retrieved 12 29, 2022, from https://www.ifla.org/past-wlic/2009/142-lin-en.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Michiyo, Y. (2021). Report from JPCOAR: Community activities in Japan. Retrieved November 14, 2022, from https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/asiaoa2021/program/agenda/23
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Moreira, J. M., & Laranjeira, C. (2018). PTCRIS: Planning and implementing a national CRIS ecosystem. 14th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems. Umeå: euroCRIS. Retrieved November 17, 2022, from http://hdl.handle.net/11366/664
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Moreira, J. M., Laranjeira, C., Carvalho, J., Ribeiro, F., Lopes, P., & Graça, P. (2016). Integrating a National Network of Institutional Repositories into the National/International Research Management Ecosystem. 13th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems : Communicating and Measuring Research Responsibly: Profiling, Metrics, Impact,Interoperability. St Andrews: Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.03.010
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Müller, U., Severiens, T., Malitz, R., & Schirmbacher, P. (2009). OA Network : An Integrative Open Access Infrastructure for Germany. D-Lib Magazine, 15:(9/10). Retrieved November 17, 2022, from https://www.dlib.org/dlib/september09/mueller/09mueller.html
     [Google Scholar]
  28. OpenDoar. (2022). Growth of OpenDOAR. Retrieved 1 1, 2023, from OpenDoar: https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/view/repository_by_country/Algeria.default.html
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Rajski, B., & Becker, P. (2019). DSpace-Konsortium Deutschland – konsortial die Nachhaltigkeit sichern. LIBREAS. Library ideas, 36. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18452/21415
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Rodrigues, E., Bollini, A., Cabezas, A., Castelli, D., Carr, L., Chan, L., . Schirrwagen. (2017). Next Generation Repositories. Behaviours and Technical Recommendations of the COAR Next Generation Repositories Working Group. COAR. doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1215014
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Stojanovski, J. (2017). Croatian national repository system DABAR & OpenAIRE. Retrieved 1 1, 2023, from https://www.openaire.eu/blogs/croatian-national-repository-system-dabar-openaire-1
     [Google Scholar]
  32. (2020). Terms of Reference for ORWG Task Groups. CARL. Retrieved from https://www.carl-abrc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ORWG-task-group-ToR-2020-20201_EN.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Whitehead, D. (2005). Repositories: What's the target? An ARROW Perspective. Proceedings of the IATUL Conferences. Québec: IATUL. Retrieved 1 1, 2023, from https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2005/papers/27
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Yi, L. (2020). Research on the University Library Alliance of China. Open Access Library Journal, 7: (8), 1-11. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106672
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhongming, Z., Dongrong, Z., Lin, L., Jianxia, M., & Xiwen, L. (2011). Developing institutional repositories network: Taking IR Grid at Chinese Academy of Sciences as an example. Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science, 4:(3/4), 24-34. Retrieved from http://ir.las.ac.cn/handle/12502/5420
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhu, Z., Ma, J., Lu, L., Liu, W., & Wu, D. (2010). Development of an institutional repositories network in Chinese academy of sciences. 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information Management and Engineering (pp. 255-259). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICIME.2010.5478055
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/jist.2023.10
Loading
مشاريع دعم وتطوير المستودعات الرقمية الأكاديمية: نحو اتحاد أكاديمي لمستودعات الوصول الحر بالجزائر
Journal of Information Studies & Technology (JIS&T) 2023, 10 (2023); https://doi.org/10.5339/jist.2023.10
/content/journals/10.5339/jist.2023.10
/content/journals/10.5339/jist.2023.10
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Institutional digital repositories, confederation of open access repositories, Algeria and المستودعات الرقمية المؤسساتية، اتحاد مستودعات الوصول الحر، الجزائر.

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error